Why do we
need a Non-Electric Computer Network?
1. Electronic and electric devices are
vulnerable to many things. For instance, to solar storms, to changes in the
Earth’s magnetosphere, to nuclear detonations, to human or natural destruction
of power plants and hubs in computer networks. All of these things are
possible, and most of them are likely.
2. There are health risks of electronic
devices, particularly in the present climate in which the Precautionary
Principle is wanting (ie. there is little or no evaluation of new technologies
before they’re commercialized; nor pricing constraints on the proliferation of
harmful tech).
3. Non-Electric systems are likely to be
more ecologically sensible, esp. if developed through fair-trade practices.
Genuine non-EPNN (non-Electric/Petrochem/Nuclear/Nano) would be the greenest.
4. A Non-Electronic Computer System
technology (NECST) has applications in harsh environments where EM systems may
not work, eg. space or other-planetary environments. (Cf. the Globus device.)
5. NECST thinking will help keep
innovation lively because it’s outside of the transistor/chip box. (Granted
there’s a lot of innovation within the transistor/chip world as well.) New NECS
Technologies will also be able to be fed back into electronic tech development,
which will benefit.
6. NECST helps keep people more aware of
the nature of computation and various different physical approaches to carrying
it out. This can only benefit education, computer engineering, public policy, and
tech generally.
No comments:
Post a Comment